Verus-Ethereum Bridge Loses $11M in Latest Cross-Chain Hack
The Verus-Ethereum bridge fell victim to an $11 million hack on May 18, 2026, with attackers stealing 103.6 tBTC, 1,625 ETH, and 147,000 USDC. The exploit marks another incident in a growing pattern of cross-chain infrastructure vulnerabilities.
FinCNews Editorial
View source
The Verus-Ethereum bridge was compromised on Monday, May 18, 2026, resulting in the loss of $11 million in digital assets. Hackers made off with 103.6 Threshold Network's tokenized bitcoin (tBTC), 1,625 ether (ETH), and 147,000 USD Coin (USDC). The attacker subsequently converted these assets into 5,402.4 ETH and currently holds the funds in wallet address 0x65Cb8b128Bf6e690761044CCECA422bb239C25F9, according to blockchain security firm PeckShield.
This incident underscores the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, infrastructure designed to enable seamless asset transfers between different blockchains. Crypto bridges have become prime targets for malicious actors due to their complex architecture and the high value of assets they facilitate. The Verus-Ethereum bridge specifically allows users to move value between the Verus network and Ethereum, including ETH and ERC-20 assets.
The latest exploit joins a troubling string of [INTERNAL: cryptocurrency bridge hacks] that have plagued the industry. Security remains a perennial challenge in blockchain infrastructure, with bridge compromises resulting in hundreds of millions in losses over recent years. These attacks highlight the technical complexity of maintaining secure cross-chain mechanisms.
From a security perspective, this breach emphasizes the importance of robust auditing, multi-signature controls, and continuous monitoring of bridge infrastructure. The incident raises questions about whether current bridge designs adequately address [INTERNAL: blockchain security risks]. Projects operating bridges must balance user accessibility with fortress-level security protocols.
Users of cross-chain bridges should exercise heightened caution, particularly with bridges that have not undergone comprehensive third-party security audits. Diversifying exposure across multiple bridges and limiting transaction sizes are practical risk-mitigation strategies.
Not financial advice.
Disclaimer: This article is AI-assisted and for informational purposes only. Nothing published on FinCNews constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation or solicitation. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. About our editorial standards →